]]> http://adverjeux.com/the-query-law-a-law-of-dispossession-and-tradition/feed/ 0 http://adverjeux.com/tilting-the-balance-in-a-sentence/ http://adverjeux.com/tilting-the-balance-in-a-sentence/#comments Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:07:05 +0000 admin http://adverjeux.com/?p=152

About Fujimori, a terrorist state primary inmate privileges. I am inclined, that justice has only the one feeling of restoring an order which is believed overwhelmed by crime. Whereby who suffers the penalty for the sake of this restoration can not be more than justifies a penalty or may enrage the person, as the Constitution, which all refer, if the aim re-education is the right conduct established by society. If we pursue the rehabilitation and redemption of the defendant, that should be no difference between one who was Head of State and the other was not, but who nevertheless died in the dungeon of a prison in the capital less than a sun live for today, the rest are distributed as part of corruption in the administrative entity of the criminal.

Justice can not tilt in a conviction or a repair, just to the side of fairness and balance, for this very surprising shocking as elders who are in the current government privileges that enjoys a terrorist state. This according to his own lexicon used by gentlemen who have a hierarchy for conduct that is not concordant to their personal vision of the law.

So in the interest of equal time should be allowed to all other prisoners of conscience and political prisoners in the dungeons, call or Piedras Gordas Castro Castro, enjoy all the privileges enjoyed by a war criminal as Mr. Fujimori, with the added difficulty that their nationality is not well defined, for our country to escape when it was discovered along and extensive corruption that had generated his government, I choose to flee as a vile coward. But the most striking are the statements of the President of the Supreme Court that holds this privilege sir, the matter is to say the same for the other prisoners, who have no say human food and human, for what is served in Peru’s prisons is not compatible with humanity, with which a person should be deprived of his liberty.

But to us that we are not striking, because during the entire term of office of Mr. Alan Garcia Perez, there are two characteristics that have dominated its mandate. One is the window that shows the degree of corruption that has come and the other is his alliance with Fujimori in partnership to obtain impunity in the next government. APRA is the shielding for the next five years, which will be prosecuted for crimes committed at this time. There are many. Everything has been a patient of all people.

If listed, would not achieve the long list, but make a summary of them: Your first offense is its alliance with the high-flying drug. Thus were able to fund before they are in government, electoral aspirations. The shadows round about this alliance many congressmen APRA lists and other groupings. The same was in the Fujimori government in its infancy, is that they had very good teachers, we refer to APRA leaders before he took his first government. Here you have to bring up some news from the time that Mr. Haya de la Torre, frequented the United States and referred to the activities and screen protection to those engaged in this character, but then was silenced, do not know if that was a lie or so it suited U.S. interests, as follows from a reading of the book Legacy of Ashes, which is a compilation of the atrocities of the CIA in Latin American countries.

But what interests us is the accumulation of privileges that shows Mr. Fujimori and not the other prisoners in the country, if, as if having been head of state should pay for their crimes in a golden prison and the rest for being poor must do so in a dungeon as exist in our country. The Lord had committed crimes against humanity and should be confined to the Naval base, together with his partner in adventure, Vladimiro Montesinos, it is precisely for being a public official, must be double the penalty.

Professionals who graduate from law Peruvian universities are more and more, iswhy I am calling on all the new young candidates to the various universities to think very good things, not choose the race because they think they are profitable, butchoose his career for his passion. that is why waltwer pachas moore

Legal professional in the areas of civil law, civil procedure, corporate and hydrocarbons, with vast experience in different occupational levels of the profession, with greater dedication in recent years in the field of Law for Hydrocarbons (Oil and Natural Gas) lawyer Negotiation and Conflict ResolutionEnvironmental Partner. With expertise in negotiation and sale of surface propertiesand physical healing legal thereof, for the development of hydrocarbon operations.Legal Specialist also by 05 years of Civil and Commercial Court of the Superior Court of Lima

Knowledge and practice channeled into existing corporate law, as is the development and formalization in all kinds of companies and private contracts in civil, commercial and oil (purchase and sale of movable and immovable property,work exploitation, exploration and extraction of hydrocarbons , easements, joint venture agreements).

On 28 December last year, the Superintendency of Occupational Risk published in the official Resolution 700/00. This resolution creates INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR ALL (TST) which main objective is reducing workplace accidents. In what way?, SRT through various statistical analysis obtained in recent years could be detected companies that during 1999, with an average of workers equal to or greater than 50, have been an accident incidence rate higher10% of the incidence rate established by the SRT for the sector and defined size, with a range of estimation error in memos not 5%, without considering in-commuting accidents.

Of 69,884 employees who reported an accident in 1999, are included under the Witness Enterprise rating, number of 3412 corresponding to 47% of the total accidents in the country, covering all sectors of the economy and grouped a total of 812,806 exposed workers.

The companies found to Company Witness, will not stop until it be to reduce its accident rate by 10% over a period of one year and subsequent control of six months.

This program begins with the communication of the SRT to the ART of the list of employers who are qualified as a company witness.

Once the communication to the ART, is communicated to such new employer by completing a form to be delivered by the ART to SRT no later than 10 days.

The next step is to establish a Program to Reduce Accidents (PRS), which consists of a diagnosis of accidents, potential causes, possible recommendations and actions to implement and completion deadlines. Turn determines a plan of visits to verify compliance with the recommended measures.

The PRS will be drawn up jointly by the ART, the employee and the head of the Health and Safety Service.

The SRT has established a maximum period of 40 days to design and sign the PRS (this term would expire on February 23 of this year) and 10 working days and forwarded to the SRT.

Breaches of the PRS are reported by the ART to SRT and are considered serious offenses. The effective implementation of the PRS will be given when the deadline set, ART fails to report any breach of SRT.

In turn, the SRT has the right to modify the parameters determining the qualification of Company Witness, expanding the number of companies.

The SRT will monitor and follow up of the above through the execution of field inspections.

This resolution is similar to the SRT Note 1035/99 which also established the creation of PRS, but in this case, the SRT companies selected arbitrarily.Through this resolution supersedes this note and all obligations and commitments.

This is intended as an overview of the new type of work proposed by the SRT.We will see in practice the effectiveness of this program and the results obtained, it will work too retrospective, analyzing accidents in 1999 from which designed the PRS, which often do not help to show the true reality current business related to workplace accidents.

The theory of natural law is a legal and philosophical belief in where all are governed by innate basic laws or the laws of nature, which are separate and distinct from the laws that are legislated. Laws are sometimes referred to as “positive laws” within the framework of the theory of natural law, to make a clear distinction between natural and social laws. the theory of natural law has greatly influenced the laws and the governments of many nations, including Britain and the United States, and is also reflected in publications such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The origins of natural law theory are found in ancient Greece. Many Greek philosophers discussed and codified the concept of natural law, and played an important role in the Greek government. Later philosophers such as Thomas Aquinas, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke based on the work of the Greeks in the natural law. Many of these philosophers used natural law as a framework to criticize and reform the substantive law, arguing that positive laws are unfair under the principles of natural law and legally insufficient.

You are already familiar with the natural theory, but may not be aware of it. Universal ideas about equity that cross cultural barriers are an excellent example of natural law. Many children, for example, appeal to a sense of justice in litigation, and most people around the world agree that murder is a serious violation of natural law. Many natural law theorists are aware that all humans are essentially reasonable, and that their motives are driven by a sense of self preservation.

Many “natural rights” which are codified in legal language are also a part of natural law, although some theorists argue that human beings can give up certain rights to live in society, for better human good. However, the basic principles of equality and the desire to do good remain. Some people are also members of religious belief in the theory of natural law and positive, while others generally refer to the basic laws of morality that may or may not be guided by religious faith.

Here some thoughts on what I think right from the origin of the characteristics that a lawyer who advises entrepreneurs should have.

The title attorney this article can be changed by any other profession related to commercial ventures, such as an accountant, architect, designer or clerk and would be similar.

10 characteristics sought by entrepreneurs who hire professionals to advise

1 .- You have to know that it is NEVER only business is always personal and

2 .- There is no risk-free advice. The entrepreneur must be advised in a dynamic environment, with a primary resource constraints and taking into account the information provided is asymmetric.

3 .- The professional must have experience. Besides a solid formation, the main requirement is to be experience.

4 .- The professional must have a high ability to resolve conflicts quickly. The entrepreneur always need solutions to the day before when requested.

5 .- The professional has to understand that the entrepreneur needs a major control of your expenses without sacrificing quality of advice

6 .- We must find the delicate balance between the council and which corresponds to the entrepreneur wants or needs to do.

7 .- Limit technicalities which corresponds to the field and not to impress the entrepreneur.

8 .- Having a high capacity to adapt to changes, which are common currency in a new venture.

9 .- Be aware that you require their services outside normal working hours and this should not affect the relationship professional / entrepreneur. Inspections, closures or accidents never occur from 10.00 to 18.00 hs. and Monday through Friday.

10 .- Having a wide network of contacts. This is absolutely relevant to entrepreneurs.Usually need more than advice, but collaboration in the choice of other professionals, service providers and potential partners.

From ancient Greece to today, the issue of natural law and positive law has occupied the attention and thinking of philosophers, lawyers and political scientists. The debate is twofold: first, what is the concept of natural law and, second, what right is more important and therefore which of them should prevail over the other.

For the monist, there is no doubt or accept the hegemony of one or accept the other right.Paraaquellos to be equivalent rights (positive law and natural law), the problem would arise in case of any conflict between its rules and, anyway, would be the monistic approach to having to decide what law should apply.

INFORMATION

Positive law is the law of the state that is developed through the legislature and which corresponds to a particular society and a tiempodeterminado. The obligatory link is what gives character to the right place. For juspositivistas, this is the only right that exists, “Right,” there is no more.

Natural law, according to its advocates say, is the right part of the same nature of man and, consequently, is always the same, regardless of the diversity of countries and cultures and over time. However, there has been no matching concepts in the authors about what is meant by “human nature”.

The Greek meant by nature Callicles health, strength and vigor of men and the weakness of others, was therefore only natural that the strong and healthy were imposed on the weak and thus the natural law should be the strongest expression of . For his part, Aristotle believed that human nature was rational, and this attribute was almost exclusive to the Greek people, so naturally the duty should translate this superiority of Greek over the barbarian and thus the philosopher “justified” the legalization of slavery.

We could go thesis, opinions and find schools of thought and pluralism and diversity.Should we give up, therefore, any attempt to clarify and define (Meaning of positive law and natural law) the natural right to stay positive law as the only one?

The definitions of social justice based on a variety of factors such as political orientation, religious beliefs, and social and political philosophy. If you ask a postmodernist on this concept, he or she is likely to tell you a fairy tale that is not attainable in any way any form of society.

A general definition of social justice is hard to find and even harder to implement. In essence, social justice refers to equal justice, not only in the courts or in criminal justice, if not have to look at all aspects of society.

This concept requires that people are in a true principle of equal rights and opportunities for everyone from the poorest person in the margins of society to the rich and wealthy, they all deserve a place in society.

But what then are the words “fair” or “equity” and define equality? Who should be responsible in society to create a fair and equitable? How to implement policies of social justice? … These may be questions that even today do not have a concrete solution, much less a precise answer.

From a policy stance that is left is to legislate to create a just society, and various programs must exist in order to raise funds needed to equalize the playing field between the rich class, average, poor people are systematically marginalized by society.

Equality of rights from the same source of law, can be defined as equal access to the things that make it possible for people in any sector of society can become successful.Therefore, the philosophy of the left would support things such as laws against discrimination and equal opportunity programs, and would be in favor of taxes, especially those who earn lot of money to pay for programs that help provide a equality for all.

The far left would say that there are certain basic needs that must be offered to all. These include things like education and security in all schools and programs that help all children to have the financial opportunity to attend college.

Also, left-wing groups, which often are called socialists, even if they differ from the definitions of socialism, they argue further that a just society can not be less than the entire world has access to food, shelter insurance and medical care. The way forward is through taxes and the implementation of government programs to ensure these things for everyone.

The political position also supports the right of a just society, but you can criticize those who make poor choices and feel that, although equality of opportunity must exist, a government should not legislate for this. In fact, it is argued that social justice is diminished when governments tend to create programs to carry out, especially when these programs call for higher taxation. In contrast, those who have money are encouraged aa must exercise a philanthropic, so do not pay higher taxes, which is clearly unfair.

From a religious perspective, you’ll find people across the political spectrum, advocating social justice. Many Christian groups believe that justice will come through actions of Christ’s mercy, especially those that help people who have been marginalized by society.

The Islamic perspective on social justice is similar, one of the five pillars of Islam is that we should all give to the poor. However, some sects of Islam promote views on where women and men are so different, women are not equal and are subordinate to men.

The postmodern critique of the idea of ​​a just society provokes an interesting debate. Can you ever be a just society? Can we see all people as inherently equal and with the same rights and privileges? … Hard to tell, because most of the philosophers who argue that it is completely fair to create a society where all people have the same opportunities and based on the importance of ethics. Even in socialist nations, the case is not poverty, but rather the unequal distribution of wealth.

In societies like the U.S., which depends on the creation of social justice, we have different problems, like starving children, homeless, and problems to ensure that all children receive the same level of education.

But these are not reasons to abandon the attempt to promote a just society and try to aspire to it. However, due to the complex nature of society, countries like the U.S. and others can not always fully attain justice for all, even the discussion of how to achieve this state is in progress.

Within the legislation of the vast majority of contemporary civil law countries is the main source of law. Here come all the concepts of social laws, is also included positive law and natural law conceptions of law are primary but have much validity for any social being.

According to this concept of law, the courts base their judgments on the provisions of the codes and civil laws, also provide solutions in this particular case and as they proceed with reference to specific cases. The courts therefore standardize their function largely on the basis of general principles of the code.

The purposes of the law based on civil codes are critical in this respect, the idea is to do justice according to social functions and behaviors, taking into account what each society says is right or wrong. For these cases there is a system of “common law”, which applies in cases such as the main source of law, while statutes are only seen as incursions into the common law and therefore with a restrictive interpretation.

Return some time and seeing the different theories about the origin of the right can be established that the civil law specifically born in ancient Rome, the empire where there was a very close relationship between rulers and citizens, who were governed by codes pre-established for optimal social behavior.

With respect to “Common law” is derived from the English tradition and comes from before the written laws we have today were available.

In many civil law countries is something like an inquisitorial system. This is where the judge or magistrate is responsible for conducting investigations into a case and the determination of the facts. This is in contrast to the adversarial system, where the charge is largely responsible for determining the facts.

In short, the civil right formula distinguishes the general principles and substantive provisions of the rules of procedure. Law is maintained as the primary source of law and judicial system often inquisitive, unbound prior or facts, and composed of special training of judicial officials with a limited ability to interpret the law.

There are several ways of finding a criminal defense attorney and one of these is advertisements in the newspaper, especially in the classified section where contact details are given. Be sure the attorneys you are considering specialize in criminal defense. There are also directories that can provide you with a generic list of lawyers and legal firms though shortlisting the best ones in such a scenario can be difficult. If you have a legal advisor, you may opt to ask for a reference or you can ask any lawyer you know about finding an experienced criminal lawyer.

If you have friends, relatives and acquaintances who were charged with criminal offenses in the past, you can contact them for a reference for a good lawyer. On the other hand, you may opt to search online since there are many websites that can assist you in finding a good defense attorney. You might also want to consult with public lawyers and get some references from them or even call the bar association of your state for suggestions.

The moment you have contacts and addresses, it is recommended that you dig up more details about them and make a short list that suits your case and is within your budget. This may be a bit challenging, especially if all of them happen to be good and very successful. However, there are certain parameters and criteria that you can use to judge them and arrive at the best criminal lawyer for your situation.

First, check the biographical information about the potential lawyer, such as educational information, where he or she comes from, and what types of cases they specialize in. Note whether they have any experience in criminal defense and whether it matches your case. Establish how many cases they have won and what kind of cases they dealt with such as murder, rape, and burglary. Make sure the lawyer has all the qualities required in your case such as good command of language and legal arguments.

Finally, check how much it will cost you. This depends largely on the defense charges and the overall case. Finding a criminal lawyer who is proficient in cases similar to yours is essential.

By: Jeremy C. Winters